Future transit oriented retail developments

When more people are taking mass transit, it creates new challenges and opportunities for offering urban retail conveniences.

Recently Richard Layman offered a good discussion of what might be ahead:

Picture the following scenario: Mr. or Mrs. suburban Anoka pulls into the parking structure adjacent to the train station along the Northstar Commuter Rail Corridor in Anoka. It is 6:50 a.m. He or she has 10 minutes to complete some errands and buy some essential sundries before boarding the 7 a.m. train headed for downtown Minneapolis. He or she can buy coffee, a breakfast sandwich and a newspaper before boarding the train.

If there is extra time, the same transit rider could drop off dry cleaning to be picked up later, leave the car at the nearby “convenience auto” stop for a wash and an oil change and deposit the toddlers at day care or pre-school.

The transit commute home in the evening presents more possibilities. How about a take-away, prepared food counter where a broasted chicken or take ’n bake pizza could be secured for the evening meal or a “mini-fitness” workout locker room?

Of course, the challenge with these “transit station marketplaces” is attracting customers and patrons during the midday hours when the train volume and passenger traffic will be at their low point.

 It seems that transit oriented “park and ride” stations as described by Lehman (who lives in the Washington DC area) may face the challenge of not having an adequate “daytime” population to patronize restaurants and retail.

Perhaps a key to future transit stations will be ensuring enough people live there or nearby.  For example, combining the concept of a transit station with a lifestyle centre complete with condominiums and townhomes.  Or, putting park-and-ride transit stops in existing”town centres” or satellite city downtowns seeing a renaissance could help.

Putting at Transit-Oriented retail development in the middle of a low-density suburb sounds like a recipe for retail failure, which could also lead to a failure to attract more transit users as going to an abandoned mall is far less appealing than going to a “happening place” full of people.

One comment

  1. Chris says:

    In Edmonton, and I imagine the situation isn’t much different in like-modeled cities, most major suburban bus terminals are sitting in the middle of giant parking lots which it next to dying shopping centers. I think these spaces are opportunities for planners, however, and that it is obvious for reasons of sustainability to readdress the way we view malls, downtowns and suburban ‘town centers’. CNUs Mall’s Into Mainstreets provides a nice blueprint on how some of these transformations can be made:


    But these revitalized centers can’t sustain themselves without transit and vice versa. And isn’t the idea that one can give birth to the other false? Commuters won’t stay anywhere not worth staying, and transit won’t run anywhere not worth going. I think you nailed it when you wrote ” …putting park-and-ride transit stops in existing ”town centres” or satellite city downtowns seeing a renaissance could help”. But is seems to me that these initiatives, were they to tie into transit would necessitate symbiotic development between the two. Also, I think that there should be a spread of good jobs around a city for the purposes of strengthening the web, not the downtown.

    I wrote on my blog about what I see as a great opportunity for planners about 6 weeks ago, and I think my optimism runs a bit higher than Layman’s. (It should be noted however, in this case I am the real ‘layman’.) http://machimachimachi.blogspot.com/2008/08/close-your-eyes-and-imagine-youve-just.html

jordan 12 cherry jordan 12 cherry jordan 12 cherry jordan 12 flu game jordan 12 flu game jordan 12 flu game jordan 12 french jordan 12 french jordan 12 french jordan 12 gym jordan 12 gym jordan 12 gym jordan 12 ovo jordan 12 ovo jordan 12 ovo jordan 12 unc jordan 12 unc jordan 12 unc jordan 12 wings jordan 12 wings jordan 12 wings