Archive for Uncategorized

Hope against the spread of generica

Visiting a new city becomes far more meaningful when you can find unique places where local people live and interact — when you can find an actual community.   Usually this requires finding locally owned and operated restaurants, cafes, shops, etc. that often anchor neighborhoods.
In so many cities, whether in North America or around the world, global brands have taken over certain commercial areas, including (or particularly) around where visitors might congregate such as off ramps from freeways, around tourist hotels, and near tourist attractions.   Not knowing whether any alternative exists just a few minutes drive or walk down a side street means that people often patronize the familiar generic chains at the expense of local independent business.

Brendan at the Where Blog offers hope against the spread of generica.  He proposes that RSS feeds on small devices like the Blackberry might offer a way for visitors to explore a new neighborhood.

Now imagine that you’re a tourist on a first-time trip to New York. Subscribe in advance to a feed like this and have bite-sized neighborhood tours sent to you every three hours. These tours could even be sequentially linked to start you off in each neighborhood, allowing for a few hours of independent exploration between tours. Heck, with the ubiquity of GPS technology, you could download a series of geo-coded tours in advance that would be triggered when you passed from one neighborhood to the next. As you walk north across Houston Street from SoHo to the Village, your phone rings. You answer, and a voice suggests that you walk three blocks east to Houston and Thompson to begin the Greenwich Village tour.

With this sort of technology, unfamiliar territory becomes a bit less intimidating. Recent transplants get out and meet more of their neighbors. Tourists get a boost in confidence that would likely encourage them to cover more ground and venture farther off the beaten path

What intrigues me about a technology like this is that it would allow many visitors to venture beyond Burger King for lunch and thereby support more independent businesses.

The same technology could provide links to restaurant menus, customer reviews and other information such as prices and speed or type of service (ie is this a restaurant for quick take out meals, or more of a sit-and-linger place).   Perhaps photographs could be available — or even live web cams.  The latter might allow locals could check to see who is there and would allow anyone to see if the place is busy or would have room for them.

With this information more people might try someplace new, whether close to home on when further away.

Neighborhood guiding technology, written by locals, could be a great way to preserve independent businesses and the character of communities within cities.

High speed rail for Tucson-Phoenix?

Would high speed rail between Tucson and Phoenix help reduce carbon monoxide emissions and other pollutants? Or would it generate more in the long run by integrating two automobile-centered cities that are arguably separate entities at the moment?

Planetizen ran an except from and Arizona Republic feature that argues for a 95-mile high speed rail link that starts at the Phoenix Airport, stops in Maricopa, Casa Grande, Eloy, Marana, and Tucson, ending somewhere between Grant and Orange Grove roads near I-10.

As cities start to sprawl into each other, a question that is emerging and will emerge in many areas is whether to encourage the integration with more transportation options — whether more freeways or something “greener.”

So, lets look at the Phoenix-Tucson rail link suggestion.

First, is there demand for the high speed rail? Does anyone commute from Tucson to Phoenix of vice versa on a daily basis? Probably only a handful of people do who have a spouse with a career in the other city. When I lived there it seemed that people lived and worked in Tucson, or lived and worked in Phoenix, and each would have almost nothing to do with the other. When I mention to people I now meet who are from Phoenix that I went to grad school a the University of Arizona in Tucson, they often say they’ve never been, or only once or twice.

Yes there is a lot of traffic on the I-10 between Tucson and Phoenix, but how many people would use rail instead? Much of this traffic might be headed to L.A.

Because both cities, but especially Phoenix, are based around the automobile (Phoenix is a good example of a car-tropolis), someone using the rail link would have to have no need for a car once they reached their destinations. Even with some better street car and metros under construction or consideration, this seems a long ways off in the future histories of these cities.

Would the high speed rail promote green development in the area? I’d argue that no, it wouldn’t do this. In fact, it might do the opposite by promoting sprawl along the I-10 corridor instead of higher density living in Phoenix and Tucson. Although some ex-urb type sprawl is happening, much of the space between Phoenix and Tucson is sparsely populated desert or agricultural land. Casa Grande, Eloy and Marana don’t seem like dense urban areas that would generate high daily demand for rail travel to Phoenix or Tucson. Eloy, for example has 10,000 people in 71 square miles for a very low population density.

Putting a high speed rail stop would likely encourage people from Phoenix or Tucson to move to these places, with their cheaper housing costs, making them into suburbs. This would result in more asphalt, more concrete, more desert paved over.

Plus, there is no transit in these communities, so anyone living there needs a car. Because there are not the same levels of amenities in these towns as in the big cities, they’d likely be driving to the city on a regular basis to do the bulk shopping required when you don’t live in a walkable neighborhood. So, even if the main breadwinner commuted by rail, the rest of the family would be burning fossil fuels in their daily lives, and the family home itself would contribute to more environmental consumption than if they lived in Tucson or Phoenix.

If we’re talking about making ecologically sound mega-regions, perhaps the answer is not in making it easier for people to live at one end of the megalopolis and work at the other side.

Pedestrians fight for their sidewalks

Pedestrians in Athens, Greece are fighting to take back their sidewalks. From a fascinating article in the Herald Tribune:

“Step on a sidewalk or try crossing any street here, and chances are you’ll instantly feel like the prey of a safari hunt,” said Vassilis Theodorou of the Hellenic Association of Road Traffic Victim Support. “This is the only place in Europe where the golden traffic rule — that pedestrians have the unconditional right of way — is so brazenly disrespected.”

In Athens alone, swarms of scooters race down crowded sidewalks. Pedestrians struggle to circumnavigate construction debris, torn-up pavement and mounds of refuse. The greatest impediment, however, is the fleet of vehicles that each day mount the city’s approximately 1,200 miles of tree-lined sidewalks or other walkways to park.

A group of people known as the Street Panthers prowl the city at night looking for illegally parked cars on sidewalks and elsewhere, and slap a bright orange sticker on them that depicts a donkey saying “I park where I want.”   Another group of citizens known as the Peeze (for pedestrians rights) organizes regular walks to take back the sidewalks.

The organized initiative may or may not change scooter and car driver behavior. But it’s a great example of citizens coming together to solve a problem. Cities are complex and governments lack the resources to solve every issue, even if there is the will (which isn’t always the case). When citizens from a broad range of backgrounds come together to solve a problem, it helps generate community. As I’ve written before, tension gives people a reason to talk to each other. Collaboration helps to forge bonds – even if victory is illusive.

New Look, New URL

 Greetings and welcome to the new and improved All About Cities blog.

After over a year of blogging, and really enjoying it, I decided to take the plunge and professionalize the blog.  With help from Cory Miller Media , I decided to move the blog to its own URL and convert over to WordPress.  Please let me know what you think of the new design!  

I still need to fill in some content on static pages, which will happen soon.  But I also want to write blog posts again, not just organize the website aspects.

Wendy

eBay – a metaphor for cities?

The model of eBay was introduced this week on The CEO for Cities Blog (which I always receive an error message when I access — can anyone help with this? .. I digress..)

Specifically, the CEOs for Cities author noted how eBay had fostered a positive, proactive community of participants. (S)He contrasted this with typical citizen participation in city issues that often involved a group of people with too much time on their hands working to prevent change rather than foster innovation in a city.

But are cities really different from eBay?

eBay provides a platform for people from all backgrounds to find others with something in common — whether a love of baseball cards, or the need for a stroller (one past — the seller — one present, the buyer).

Don’t cities do this — bring millions of people into close proximity and offer amenities and services that allow people to meet and mingle with the like-minded?

Moreover, eBay provides the infrastructure for individuals to create their own businesses and work for others.

Cities provide sanitation, policing, infrastructure and other services. Doesn’t eBay do the same? They offer a clean and efficient website (infrastructure), and police the community such that fraudsters are removed.

So, is eBay an virtual city? If so, what could physical cities learn from it?

Busy week

I’ve had a heavy work week — apologies for no posts. Have several percolating that I’ll try to post soon.

Thanks for the comments, I’ll respond soon.

BTW — does anyone miss the pictures? I stopped because I didn’t think they added enough to justify the time and ifddling it took to get them there.

Until 2007 …

I’m signing off work and blogging until January to spend time with family. In the new year you can look forward to blog entries about:

  • Babies, children, and urban density
  • How I chose Vancouver
  • Core-Suburb Tension in Toronto
  • What I did on my winter vacation (maybe…depends)
  • Any suggestions?

Have a great holiday everyone!

Corporate head offices and city economic development

Richard Florida responded to my previous post with some great ideas and insight. A good discussion has emerged over on his creativity exchange blog.

If you don’t like "the state" don’t live in a city

I often roll my eyes at people who choose to live in the city, and then complain endlessly about local, regional or national laws and bylaws that govern what’s acceptable and what isn’t. Such people, or their defenders, complain about the “the state” intruding in their lives.

Watchdog groups are of course valuable counters to make us all think about the balance between freedom and oppression in a city. But, if you live in the city, you implicitly accept a certain amount of government regulation of your life and the lives of those around you.

The rise of many modern regulatory aspects of “the state” emerged in the 19th century with the growth of cities from villages into the foundations of modern megalopolis. This is not a coincidence. Many world cities emerged at the confluence of trade routes, and in order to keep trade moving, the city needed a certain level of order. It still does.

If you want to live outside the state, leave the city. There are lots of places in the world where you can live free of “the state” and its regulations — whether the wilderness in North America or in certain areas of “failed states” where no overarching power protects you.

In these places there are no welfare cheques, police, dress codes, behaviour standards, or encoded laws. However, you will have to provide for yourself. Such places can make a great, exhilerating vacation (especially when you can take essentials with you), but most people complaining about the role of the state in their lives would be hardpressed to survive without it.

Cities are all about living in “the state.” Right now, I think many Canadian cities would do better with heavier state involvement in terms of protecting property rights and upholding certain standards of civility.

All About Cities

I love cities. For years the multifaceted aspects of cities have fascinated me. In particular I’m intrigued by the tensions and creativity that result from people, organizations, businesses from diverse backgrounds all brushing against each other in a confined space. Cities contain tensions as well as collaboration. The juxtaposition of the two generates culture, brings people together in communities. Cities today compete globally for people and investment. Some cities are rapidly growing and changing embracing diversity and tension, others are not. There is so much to cities that they deserve a blog.

This is the first posting for my blog about cities. In subsequent postings I’ll expore in detail the various aspects of cities.