Drug cartel wars in Mexico’s borderlands as well as Taliban and tribal Afghanistan heroin production can generate violence and lawlessness in individual cities thousands of kilometres away. And city governments often lack the policing and even legal means to stop the chaos and control their streets.
There are as many examples as there are cities (Toronto had a spree of suspected gang violence last summer, in Los Angeles it can be endemic). But the recent gang war in Vancouver, which has resulted in 32 shootings in 64 days got me thinking about the needs of metro areas in todays complex world.
From a recent Canadian Press article:
OTTAWA — The increase in gang violence on the streets of Vancouver and other Canadian cities has direct ties to the grisly drug-cartel wars that have terrorized Mexico and some American border towns, say Canadian and U.S. police.
Violence has reached a fever pitch in parts of Mexico where the government of President Felipe Calderon has sent in 45,000 soldiers and 5,000 federal police to try to curb cartel activity. More than 7,000 have died in the last two years, with 1,000 deaths this January alone.
…
The Washington Times quoted senior U.S . military officials Tuesday who warned that if Mexico’s two main cartels joined forces, they would have the equivalent power of an army of 100,000.
When the drug cartels can mobilize the equivalent of 100,000 troops, the national government is not in control.
17th Century political philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that without government or — the State — humans would live in a state of nature, where life was “nasty, brutish and short.” Therefore, people willingly relinquished some of their freedoms and wealth in exchange for government-imposed order.
There are other theories about the state, including that to be effective, a state must have a monopoly on violence. The Mexican borderlands appear to be failing on both counts — as are many other parts of the world.
The streets of many cities too are starting to become extensions of these states of nature — places where the government does not have the monopoly on violence. The police in Metro Vancouver’s various municipalities have not solved any of the shootings (to the best of my knowledge). The courts have not successfully kept anyone charged with any related crime (such as selling armor-piercing bullets — not allowed in Canada) locked up.
The metro area is hampered by (at least) two things:
1. The metro region does not have one central government, nor one central policing force. This makes it harder to maintain order when gangs move seamlessly from one municipality to the next.
2. Laws and jurisdictional procedures created for a more rural nation and/or for a different era don’t work.
There are serious concerns about more innocent people getting hurt. Many shootings have been in crowded mall parking lots or on busy streets. The police appear to have reasonably good knowledge about who is involved, but not enough evidence to charge them with sufficiently significant crimes that judges won’t grant them bail while they wait for trial in the backlogged court system, which could take months or years. In the meantime, the shooting continues.
Maybe cities need a new deal. Maybe cities’ needs will further push the idea of City States — afterall, you can’t have a stable, prosperous economy or offer a good quality of life when gang wars make people fear going out.

